I’ve always maintained that even religion should have a shelf life. This comes from a belief that religions were created at different times, basis the prevalent culture, accommodating the scenarios- natural and human created, and lifestyles in those times. The teachings were aimed at a more meaningful...
“Your people will judge you on what you build, not what you destroy”, said the US President. But sometimes, to create, one had to destroy – for instance, his blog’s old design. Now came the difficult part. He hoped that in the two most important sections, there’d still be something good enough to write – Home, About.
until next time, whatcha think of the revamp? 
People!! While I thank all those of you who gave me their feedback (and it helped), I did not get much feedback on the content. The other person to thank is the one who first used the smart phrase used in the title. So, assuming all’s well, am planning a couple of tiny changes to the entire flow.
I’m shifting the Manuscrypts Monday post to Tuesday, since 2 posts on one day is a bit too much, even by my ‘prolific’ standards. Which means that there will be posts on all days except Saturday.
Monday – Brants
Tuesday – Manuscrypts
Wednesday – Brants
Thursday – Manuscrypts
Friday – Brants
Sunday – Restorants
No, I don’t expect you to mug it up nor am I doing this because of a misplaced sense of self importance 
Its only because the blogs used to have different audiences, and now all the content is in one place. Like a reader said, because I attempt so much of wordplay in all the posts, it might be difficult for readers to figure out which category the post belongs to. So, I’m hoping the above serves as a kind of indicator.
The second change is to do with the Brants content. I have noticed a disconcerting habit of rambling, so I’m going to attempt a more brevity-led approach from Friday.
until next time,koi shaq ya sawaal?
And this is for Technorati
<a href=”http://technorati.com/claim/jwtdg93aav” rel=”me”>Technorati Profile</a>
…and we lament, ‘Oh, he has changed’, without pausing to consider the objectivity of the statement. We like people to stay whoever they have been so long, because it then means we don’t have to alter the patterns we have set for them, and when, in our view, they alter themselves even a wee bit, we frown, and even that small changes causes a butterfly effect on the set of patterns, however irrelevant they might be to the particular change.
And that was what i discovered the last time I checked – ‘our view’. In many cases, it may not be the person that changes, but only our view of him. Our views, which change constantly as a result of all the experiences we keep having. Our views, which keep adding layer after layer, filter after filter,so that the tint that we see once may never be seen again.That perhaps is why the youth are not able to have a child like innocence in their perspectives, and the middle aged can never find their youthful exuberance in their views, and so on…
And so, the next time, i say ‘You have changed’, I shall perhaps do a quick review of what really has changed.
until next time, next change
@manuprasad.com
